DENOTATION OF DISCOURSE IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Abstract
Background. Over the past thirty years, the concept of “discourse” has been closely integrated into many scientific disciplines, and therefore its determination is complicated. Researchers cannot come to a common opinion regarding this linguistic category. An overview of discourse in a diachronic perspective allows us to explore diverse approaches to its study and identify the most relevant definition of this linguistic term.
Purpose. In this paper, an attempt is made to interpret the term discourse by examining it in a diachronic aspect.
Materials and methods. The research is based on general scientific methods (generalization, analysis) and a descriptive method.
Results. As a result of the analysis of the theoretical material, the authors summarize that there is no generally accepted interpretation of this linguistic category in the linguistic literature. The researchers agree and disagree in some ways, which is reflected in the inconsistency of their opinions. However, the review of scientific papers offered in this study makes it possible to get a summary view of linguists on this issue. Summarizing the data gained, the authors give their interpretation of the concept of “discourse”. Moreover, the authors come to the conclusion that a wide range of scientific applications of the term and the vector of scientific integration that is gaining popularity makes a significant contribution to the development of discourse theory as an interdisciplinary field of research.
Practical implications. The results of this study can be applied by researchers of scientific discourse, as well as in the preparation of textbooks on academic writing, the style of scientific text.
Downloads
References
Arutyunova N.D. Diskurs [Discourse]. Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Sovetskaja jenciklopedija, 1990, pp. 52-56.
Borbot’ko V.G. Elementy teorii diskursa [Elements of discourse theory]. Groznyy: Checheno-Ingush State University Publ., 1981, 113 p.
Van Deyk T.A. K opredeleniyu diskursa [On the definition of discourse]. London: Sage Publ., 1998, 384 p.
Grigor’eva V.S. Diskurs kak element kommunikativnogo protsessa: pragmalingvisticheskiy i kognitivnyy aspekty: monografiya [Discourse as an element of the communicative process: pragmalinguistic and cognitive aspects]. Tambov: Tambov State Technical University Publ., 2007, 288 p.
Kibrik A.A., Plungyan V.A. Funktsionalizm i diskursivno-orientirovannye issledovaniya [Functionalism and discursive-oriented research]. Fundamental’nye napravleniya sovremennoy amerikanskoy lingvistiki [Fundamental trends of modern American linguistics]. Moscow, 1997, pp. 307-322.
Kravtsova E.V. Nauchnyy diskurs kak vid institutsional’nogo tipa diskursa [Scientific discourse as a type of institutional type of discourse]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Lingvistika [YuUrGU Bulletin. Linguistics series], 2012, no 25, pp. 130-131.
Krasnykh V.V. «Svoy» sredi «chuzhikh»: mif ili real’nost’? [“Alike” among “strangers”: myth or reality]. Moscow: Gnozis Publ, 2003, 375 p.
Kubryakova E.S. O ponyatiyakh diskursa i diskursivnogo analiza v sovremennoy lingvistike (obzor) [On the concepts of discourse and discursive analysis in modern linguistics (review)]. Diskurs, rech’, rechevaya deyatel’nost’ [Discourse, speech, speech activity]. Moscow, 2000, pp. 7-25.
Nelyubin L.L. Tolkovyy perevodovedcheskiy slovar’ [Explanatory Translation Dictionary]. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2003, 320 p.
Popov A.Yu. Osnovnye otlichiya teksta ot diskursa [The main differences of the text from the discourse]. Tekst i diskurs: Problemy ekonomicheskogo diskursa [Text and discourse: problems of economic discourse]. St. Petersburg: SPbGUAF, 2001, pp. 41-44.
Sossyur F. de. Kurs obshchey lingvistiki [General linguistics course]. Moscow: URSS Publ., 2004, 256 p.
Temnova E.V. Sovremennye podkhody k izucheniyu diskursa [Modern approaches to the study of discourse]. Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikatsiya [Language, consciousness, communication], vol. 26. Moscow: MAKS Press, 2004, pp. 24-32.
Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Gardariki, 2004, 1072 p. URL: http://philosophy.niv.ru/doc/dictionary/encyclopedic/articles/378/diskurs.htm (accessed 03 May 2021)
Khomutova T.N. Tipologiya diskursa: integral’nyy podkhod [Typology of discourse: an integral approach]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Lingvistika [YuUrGU Bulletin. Linguistics series], 2014, no 2, pp. 14-19.
Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. URL: https://www.dwds.de/wb/dwb2/discours#wb-1 (accessed 14 June 2021).
Harris Z. Discourse analysis. Language, 1952, vol. 28, no 1, pp. 1-30.
Online etymology dictionary. URL: https://www.etymonline.com/word/discourse (accessed 03 May 2021).
Copyright (c) 2022 Aigul R. Sushkova, Albina A. Bilyalova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.






























