THE IMPACT OF INDUSTRIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOCIO-CULTURAL EVOLUTION OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES

Keywords: globalization, industrial and economic modernization, socio-cultural transformation, local communities, sustainable development

Abstract

The determining factor of socio-cultural transformation is industrial and economic modernization, which changes the structure of the world economy as a whole. The leading trend in the development of civilization is the desire for uniformity, which leads to the need to analyze the combination, correlation, interaction of “modernized” and “traditional” forms of development of local communities.

The aim of the study is to analyze the impact of the processes of production and economic modernization on the modification of sociocultural development, to determine the relationships and interdependencies of the economy, culture and sociality, to identify cause-and-effect relationships and trends in the evolution of the sociocultural sphere.

Materials and methods. The study of the processes of production, economic and socio-cultural transformation within the framework of a polyparadigm approach allows using a set of research paradigms, within which various aspects of modernization are considered. The civilizational approach makes it possible to explain the problem of correlation, interaction of general civilizational universals and local specifics.

Results. The article shows that the main trends in the production, economic and socio-cultural development of local communities are formed under the influence of internal and external factors. Modification of the production and economic sphere contributes to the evolution of culture and sociality, determines the structure of the life of local communities, forms a new system of diverse processes of activity. There are destructive tendencies leading to the disintegration of the integrity of the socio-cultural space, a decrease in the stabilizing potential of the traditional way of local communities, followed by pauperization and marginalization of a significant part of the population. The diversification of production and economic activities contributes to the modification of the socio-cultural way of life, the transition from the paradigm of maintaining the stability of traditions to the paradigm of innovative changes.

Practical implications. The results can be used for further research into the processes of sociocultural development and in the process of teaching social disciplines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vladimir S. Shmakov, Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS

Doctor of Science (Philosophy), leading researcher

References

Список литературы

Амбарова П.А. Социальная фрагментация сообществ в современной России: в поисках социологической теории // Социологические исследования. 2022. № 1. С.41–51. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250017229-4

Гаджиев Р.С. О содержании социокультурных систем // Вопросы философии. 2018. № 11. С. 16–24.

Горшков М.К. О социальных результатах постсоветских трансформаций // Социологические исследования, 2019. № 11. С. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250007445-2

Калинин А.М., Самохвалов В.А. Стратегические дисбалансы экономической политики // ЭКО. 2022. № 8 (578). С. 155–172. https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2022-8-155-172

Лапин Н. И. Спонтанность модернизации в регионах России и конституционные принципы ее регулирования // Власть. 2017. № 3. С. 25–33.

Межуев Б.В. «Остров Россия» и российская политика идентичности // Россия в глобальной политике. 2019. № 6. С.162–175.

Михайлов В. Т., Рунге Й. Идентичность человека. Территориальные общности и социальное пространство: опыт концептуализации // Социологические исследования. 2019. №1. С. 52–62. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250003747-4

Морина Л. П. Социокультурные трансформации в современном мире: аналитические аспекты // Ученые записки Крымского федерального университета имени В. И. Вернадского. Социология. Педагогика. Психология. 2012. Т. 24 (65). № 1–2. С. 131–136.

Неклесса А.И. Цивилизация как процесс: мультиплицированные субъекты Постмодерна // Полис. Политические исследования. 2021. № 5. С. 39–55. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.05.04

Салин П.Б. Эпоха на разрыв // Россия в глобальной политике. 2020. № 6 (106). С. 134–143.

Семеренко И.С. Дискурсы развития в социальных науках: в преддверье этического поворота // Полис. Политические исследования. 2021. № 2. С. 25–45. DOI 10.17976/jpps/2021.02.03.

Стычинский М.С. Кризис идентичности: механизмы забвения и мемориализация в условиях глобализации // Вопросы философии. 2020. № 7. С. 35–39.

Шакирова Е.Ю., Листвина Е.В. Современная социокультурная ситуация: антропологические метаморфозы // Вопросы философии. 2018. № 1. С. 55–65.

Шмаков В.С. Сельские локальные сообщества: к методологии исследования // Сибирский философский журнал. 2017. Т. 15, № 4. С. 135–145.

Flew T. Populism and Globalization: Towards a Post-Global Era? [Электронный ресурс]. January 22. 2019. Р. 1–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3321448

Mendis Patrick. Glocalization: The Human Side of Globalization as If the Washington Consensus Mattered. Lulu.com, 2007-01-01. 442 с.

References

Ambarova P.A. Social’naya fragmentaciya soobshchestv v sovremennoj Rossii: v poiskah sociologicheskoj teorii [Social Fragmentation of Communities in Modern Russia: in Search of a Sociological Theory]. Sociological research, 2022, no. 1, pp. 41–51. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250017229-4

Gorshkov M.K. O social’nyh rezul’tatah postsovetskih transformacij [About the social results of post-Soviet transformations]. Sociological research, 2019, no. 11, pp. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250007445-2

Gadzhiev R.S. O soderzhanii sociokul’turnyh sistem [About the content of socio-cultural systems]. Questions of philosophy, 2018, no. 11, pp. 16–24.

Kalinin A.M., Samohvalov V.A. Strategicheskie disbalansi ekonomicheskoi politiki [Strategic imbalances of economic policy]. ECO, 2022, no. 8 (578), pp. 155–172. https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2022-8-155-172

Lapin N. I. Spontannost’ modernizacii v regionah Rossii i konstitucionnye principy ee regulirovaniya [The spontaneity of modernization in the regions of Russia and the constitutional principles of its regulation]. Power, 2017, no. 3, pp. 25–33.

Mezhuev B.V. «Ostrov Rossiya» i rossijskaya politika identichnosti [The “Island of Russia” and the Russian Identity Policy]. Russia in global politics, 2019, no. 6, pp. 162–175.

Mihajlov V. T., Runge J. Identichnost’ cheloveka. Territorial’nye obshchnosti i social’noe prostranstvo: opyt koncertualizacii [The identity of a person. Territorial communities and social space: the experience of conceptualization]. Sociological research. 2019, no. 1, pp. 52–62. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250003747-4

Morina L. P. Sociokul’turnye transformacii v sovremennom mire: analiticheskie aspekty [Sociocultural transformations in the modern world: analytical aspects] Scientific notes of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Sociology. Pedagogy. Psychology, 2012, vol, 24 (65), no.1–2, pp. 131–136.

Neklessa A.I. Civilizaciya kak process: mul’tiplicirovannye sub»ekty Postmoderna. [Civilization as a process: the multiplicated subjects of Postmodernity] Policy. Political studies, 2021, no. 5, pp. 39–55. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.05.04 N

Stychinskij M.S. Krizis identichnosti: mekhanizmy zabveniya i memorializaciya v usloviyah globalizacii [Identity crisis: mechanisms of oblivion and memorialization in the context of globalization]. Questions of philosophy, 2020, no. 7, pp. 25–39.

Salin P.B. Epoha na razryv [The Era of the Gap]. Russia in global politics, 2020, no. 6 (106), pp. 134–143.

Semerenko I.S. Diskursy razvitiya v social’nyh naukah: v preddver’e eticheskogo povorota [Discourses of Development in the Social Sciences: on the threshold of an ethical Turn]. Polis. Political Studies, 2021, no. 2, pp. 25–45. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.02.03

Shakirova E.Yu., Listvina E.V. Sovremennaya sociokul’turnaya situaciya: antropologicheskie metamorfozy [Modern socio-cultural situation: anthropological metamorphoses]. Questions of philosophy, 2018, no. 1, pp. 55–65.

Shmakov V. S. Selskie lokalnie soobschestva: k metodologii issledovaniya [Rural local communities: to the methodology of research]. Siberian Philosophical Journal, 2017, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 135–145.

Flew T. Populism and Globalization: Towards a Post-Global Era? January 22. 2019, pp. 1–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3321448

Mendis Patrick. Glocalization: The Human Side of Globalization as If the Washington Consensus Mattered. Lulu.com, 2007-01-01. 442 p.

Abstract views: 303

Published
2022-12-29
How to Cite
Shmakov, V. (2022). THE IMPACT OF INDUSTRIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOCIO-CULTURAL EVOLUTION OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES. Russian Social and Humanitarian Studies, 14(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2022-14-4-431-449
Section
Philosophical Studies