The film hero: a linguocultural aspect

Keywords: hero image, film text, linguoculturology, film discourse, speech portrait, call signs, cultural memory, multimodal analysis

Abstract

Background. The hero in a film text is not merely a plot element but a cultural model through which behavioural norms, ideas of duty, collective solidarity and socially accepted forms of emotional self-expression are articulated. War cinema is particularly relevant in this respect, since heroism is represented under conditions of risk, professional responsibility and the constant tension between personal feeling and collective duty.

Purpose. The article aims to identify the linguocultural mechanisms that construct the heroic figure in Leonid Bykov’s film Only “Old Men” Are Going to Battle as a representative example of Soviet war film discourse.

Materials and methods. The material is the film text considered as a multimodal unity of verbal, visual, intonational and musical resources. The analysis focuses on forms of address, call signs and nicknames, directive and mentoring utterances, humorous exchanges, the rituals of the “singing squadron” and song episodes. The methodology combines linguocultural interpretation, discourse-pragmatic analysis, stylistic description of character speech and multimodal analysis.

Results. The study shows that the film hero is constructed not through declarative pathos but through professional normativity, responsibility for others and an ethics of preserving humanity in an extreme situation. The “language of action” combines brevity, precision and disciplinary normativity, whereas mentoring and supportive speech strategies represent leadership as care. Call signs and nicknames function as markers of group belonging and value-based typification. Songs operate as a code of cultural memory and a means of emotional synchronisation. Thus, the heroic figure appears as a linguocultural construction in which speech, intonation, music and visual organisation jointly reinforce a humanistic understanding of heroism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ekaterina V. Seredina, Belgorod State University

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor

Ekaterina F. Kudryashova, Belgorod State University

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor

Elena V. Kuznetsova, Belgorod State University

Assistant

References

Аннисимова, Е. Е. (2003). Лингвистика текста и межкультурная коммуникация (на материале креолизованных текстов). Москва: Academia. 128 с.

Быков, Л. Ф. (реж.). (1973). В бой идут одни «старики» [Художественный фильм]. Киностудия им. А. Довженко.

Воробьев, В. В. (2008). Лингвокультурология. Москва: РУДН. 336 с. ISBN: 978-5-209-02717-1. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QTNGJV

Добросклонская, Т. Г. (2019). Медиалингвистика: системный подход к изучению языка СМИ. Москва: Флинта. 264 с.

Карасик, В. И. (2002). Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. Волгоград: Перемена. 477 с. ISBN: 5-88234-552-2. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UGQAMP

Кожокару, Т. И. (2021). К вопросу о методологии анализа фильма. Артикульт, 4(44), 118–148. https://doi.org/10.28995/2227-6165-2021-4-118-148. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QJYINC

Лотман, Ю. М. (2020). Семиотика кино и проблемы киноэстетики. Санкт Петербург: Азбука. 352 с.

Маслова, В. А. (2001). Лингвокультурология. Москва: Академия. 208 с. ISBN: 5-7695-0745-4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UKCOEJ

Нелюбина, Ю. А. (2013). Кинодискурс как объект лингвистического изучения. Челябинский гуманитарий. Серия: Филология и искусствоведение, 3(24), 71–74.

Покровская, Н. В. (2022). Film discourse study in foreign linguistics at the beginning of the 21st century. Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20220149. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZKFODZ

Слышкин, Г. Г., & Ефремова, М. А. (2004). Кинотекст: опыт лингвокультурологического анализа. Москва: Водолей Publishers. 153 с.

Телия, В. Н. (1996). Русская фразеология. Семантический, прагматический и лингвокультурологический аспекты. Москва: Языки русской культуры. 288 с. ISBN: 5-88766-047-3. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SUMHNJ

Штейн, С. Ю. (2021). Методико методологическая схема исследований кинематографа. Артикульт, 4(44), 6–30.

Bateman, J. A., & Schmidt, K. H. (2012). Multimodal film analysis: How films mean. London: Routledge. 376 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128220

Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 370 p.

Forceville, C. J., & Urios Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 392 p. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. 312 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. 256 p.

O’Halloran, K. L. (Ed.). (2004). Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives. London: Continuum. 240 p.

O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & Wignell, P. (Eds.). (2023). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge. 512 p.

Tryhubava, D. (2020). Film annotations as an object of discourse analysis. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 86, 1427–1436. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.08.165

Wildfeuer, J. (2014). Film discourse interpretation: Towards a new paradigm for multimodal film analysis. New York: Routledge. 276 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020376620

References

Annisimova, E. E. (2003). Linguistics of the text and intercultural communication (based on creolized texts). Moscow: Academia. 128 p.

Bykov, L. F. (Director). (1973). Only the old men go to battle [Motion picture]. Dovzhenko Film Studio.

Vorobyev, V. V. (2008). Linguoculturology. Moscow: RUDN University. 336 p. ISBN: 978 5 209 02717 1. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QTNGJV

Dobrosklonskaya, T. G. (2019). Medialinguistics: A systematic approach to the study of media language. Moscow: Flinta. 264 p.

Karasik, V. I. (2002). The language circle: Personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena. 477 p. ISBN: 5 88234 552 2. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UGQAMP

Kozhokaru, T. I. (2021). On the methodology of film analysis. Artikult, 4(44), 118–148. https://doi.org/10.28995/2227 6165 2021 4 118 148. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QJYINC

Lotman, Y. M. (2020). Semiotics of cinema and problems of film aesthetics. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka. 352 p.

Maslova, V. A. (2001). Linguoculturology. Moscow: Akademia. 208 p. ISBN: 5 7695 0745 4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UKCOEJ

Nelyubina, Y. A. (2013). Film discourse as an object of linguistic study. Chelyabinsk Humanitarian. Series: Philology and Art History, 3(24), 71–74.

Pokrovskaya, N. V. (2022). Film discourse study in foreign linguistics at the beginning of the 21st century. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20220149. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZKFODZ

Slyshkin, G. G., & Efremova, M. A. (2004). Film text: An experience of linguocultural analysis. Moscow: Vodoley Publishers. 153 p.

Teliya, V. N. (1996). Russian phraseology: Semantic, pragmatic, and linguocultural aspects. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. 288 p. ISBN: 5 88766 047 3. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SUMHNJ

Shtein, S. Y. (2021). Methodological scheme for film studies. Artikult, 4(44), 6–30.

Bateman, J. A., & Schmidt, K. H. (2012). Multimodal film analysis: How films mean. London: Routledge. 376 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128220

Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 370 p.

Forceville, C. J., & Urios Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 392 p. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. 312 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. 256 p.

O’Halloran, K. L. (Ed.). (2004). Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives. London: Continuum. 240 p.

O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & Wignell, P. (Eds.). (2023). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge. 512 p.

Tryhubava, D. (2020). Film annotations as an object of discourse analysis. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 86, 1427–1436. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.08.165

Wildfeuer, J. (2014). Film discourse interpretation: Towards a new paradigm for multimodal film analysis. New York: Routledge. 276 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020376620


Published
2026-06-30
How to Cite
Seredina, E., Kudryashova, E., & Kuznetsova, E. (2026). The film hero: a linguocultural aspect. Russian Social and Humanitarian Studies, 18(2), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.12731/3033-5981-2026-18-2-556
Section
Languages of Foreign Countries